CATEGORY: Gun Violence | Analyzed Content | Explicit content 3 (scale 1-5) - Rated NC-17
A man claimed that he was unexpectedly attacked by an unidentified person and that he acted out of self-defense when he automatically fired to neutralize the danger.
1» This altercation was clearly born out of a long conflict between the two men.
2 » Carry a weapon = a responsibility. People who have no control over their emotions and carry a gun = a real danger.
3 » Personally...yeah he hit with the stick but seeing this as a direct life-threatening situation..nah. Maybe I am not that fast impressed, but he's sitting in the car (shield), the attacker already lowered his stick and there was a bystander beginning to deescalate. You could show your gun and hold it close to you while aiming in case of a follow-up attack.
4 » Shooting with no respect for the bystanders.
5 » The first shot could be justified by acting out of stress (I personally would not shoot)...but the follow-up shots, that's no self-defense whatsoever.
*Automatically translated, so mistakes included!
Councilman Julis accused of murder: "Keep shooting in the head until he dies"
Sunday, 02 October 2016, 12:58
Edited by: Ohad Peter
Suleiman Amer is accused of murdering Munir Nabuani, a local contractor with whom he had been in conflict for a long time. According to the indictment, Amer shot his victim seven times and then left the scene "calmly" and hid his gun.
Amer was charged Sunday in Haifa District Court with first-degree murder and disrupting court proceedings for an incident last month that shot a 45-year-old local man, a 45-year-old local contractor with whom he had been at odds for a long time. The prosecutor's office filed a 54-year-old plea against Amer, pending legal proceedings against him.
On September 5, prophets sent a message to Amar saying: "Dog, yesterday I promised to do something and did not exist. But a lot I am going to do today, you should not come to the council I come to you." The indictment further describes that at 8:30 a.m. Amer arrived at the council building and parked in the place reserved for him. Nabuani arrived shortly afterwards and parked his car behind that of the mayor. Prophets came out of the vehicle and pulled out a wooden stick about a meter long. He later started shouting at Amer that he should die and attacked his vehicle with the stick.
The indictment further states that at this point the secretary of the council, Ziad Yin, arrived, who noticed Nabuani from a distance and asked to prevent a confrontation between the two. However, upon his arrival, Amar fired several short-range shots at his upper body and the head of a prophet. Amer continued to approach Nabuani as he fired at him, though it dropped the stick he was holding to the ground, and despite Hain's attempts to prevent it from happening.
According to the indictment, Amer shot Nabuani seven times, the cause of his death being determined by a bullet hitting his heart. In addition, Amer is accused of leaving the gun and his mobile phone, with the intention of disrupting his trial. It is further described that after the incident, Amer behaved "calmly" and even passed by the deceased without offering him help.
About three hours after the incident in front of the council building, Amer turned himself in to police. In his investigation, he claimed that he was unexpectedly attacked by an unidentified person and that he acted out of self-defense when he automatically fired to neutralize the danger. He further claimed in his investigation that it was only after he had finished shooting that he recognized that this was prophetic. However, the indictment states that the video from the incident scene looks prophetic when he speaks to Amer who has already noticed him at this time. Amer was accused of concealing many details about his conduct after the incident throughout his interrogations, and until he extradited himself to the police. When confronted by his investigators with these findings, according to the indictment, he claimed that these were minor details he did not remember.
Our content = for educational purposes only. We do NOT GLORIFY VIOLENCE in any way! Please read our story on Social media / Website / Patreon. When you have more background information, or you notice mistakes in our description/video, please give us your feedback.
Viewer discretion advised!
© 2020 Real Violence for Knowledge.